Friday, December 3, 2010

Return Card Received

I received the post card I included with my revised full manuscript submission in the mail postmarked November 30th.

The editor has my work, and now I wait, distracting myself with new edits and fresh manuscripts. If the editor does not like the revised full, my next submission should be closer to what she wants. I have a better idea of how to craft my story for Silhouette Romantic Suspense.

Wednesday, November 24, 2010

What did I send?

I thought it might be helpful to include what exactly I sent in my revision package:

- brief letter to the editor thanking her for the opportunity, reminding her what my story was about, and letting her know I had made the changes she'd suggested

- self-address stamped postcard (can be purchased from USPS) so the editor can drop it in the mail when she opens the package. This is piece of mind for me that the package wasn't lost en route.

- revised synopsis (4 pages double-spaced) Eharlequin guidelines specify a two-page single-spaced synopsis, but their example shows a double-spaced synopsis. When I asked for clarification from eharl (always follow specification!) the response was to send it double-spaced.

- self addressed return envelope with postage (not to hold the manuscript, I don't need that returned, just a regular letter sized for a response from the editor)

- cover page with my contact information and information about the book (title, word count, author name)

- full manuscript

I then put everything into a Tyvek 10x13 envelope, addressed it to the editor, wrote "requested materials" on the outside, and mailed it!

Revisions Reflection

I mailed my revised manuscript to Silhouette Romantic Suspense last night. I had set a deadline for myself of a month based on feedback from other Harlequin authors and was pleased I met the deadline with no problem. More than proving I can/am willing to make changes in a timely manner, knowing I had four weeks prevented me from reviewing one scene again and again or obsessing about the editor's comments. When I got stuck on something, I sidelined it, and worked on another area of the manuscript and circled around later. I made continuous progress and felt really good about that.

I also heeded the warning of one Harlequin authors, who mentioned she is careful to leave the parts of the manuscript not commented on alone (unless other changes impact it) since the editor liked the story enough to spend the time on revisions, rewriting the whole book isn't necessary. It was tempting to start major rewrites on every chapter, but I focused my time on the parts of the story the editor suggested needed work.

I realized a number of issues with my work as I revised. While the guidelines spell out these suggestions pretty clearly, reading them and understanding them well enough to execute them are two different animals.

1.) Keep the book in the hero and heroine's point of view. While I have read other SRS/HRS where other POVs are presented briefly, there is limited space to tell the story and making every word count is important.

2.) Start the book with an inciting incident, either something highly emotional or action-packed. Looking at some of my other manuscripts, I realize using the first 20-50 pages to build to an event isn't ideal. Many romantic suspense books I've read start with finding a dead body, an attack on the hero or heroine, or a catastrophic event (plane crash, earthquake). I reconsidered this factor in another book I wrote that had a prologue. Was the prologue critical to the story or was it a place for me to info dump back story? I decided it was the later and removed it.

3.) The sense of danger has to be ever present. At no time should the hero or heroine feel completely safe and comfortable about where they are. The looming threat should drive them closer and propel the romantic relationship. I was careful not to translate this into "more stuff happening," but to build on the existing suspense elements and sharpen/escalate them.

4.) I need to spend more time developing the hero's emotional changes and explaining why he makes the decisions he does regarding the heroine. This was trickier to execute, to make it clear he is impossibly drawn to the heroine in such a way that even the internal and external stakes don't keep him away and why he chooses to either act on that attraction or squelch it.

Next Steps:
After I mail the manuscript, I set it aside. I try not to obsess about getting to the mailbox every day to see if I have a response. I focus on the next book, which has got to be stronger than the last by applying what I learned!

Friday, November 5, 2010

Request for Revisions

I received a request for revisions from an editor at Silhouette Romantic Suspense! The letter was approximately 3 pages of suggestions, some of the points about the manuscript as a whole, and some specific to a given scene.

After conferring with several wonderful people on SubCare and with the help and encouragement of friends and family, I've worked out a plan of action.

I have approximately a month to complete the changes and send them back.

1. Take a day (or two) to think about the changes. Read the letter about 10 times.

2. Go through the manuscript and mark (via comments and track changes) places where the editor suggests I make revisions.

3. Skim through the manuscript (I've written two more books for SRS since I submitted this one) and refamiliarize myself with the story. Make comments in the margins where I see some of the overarching problems referenced in the letter.

4. Complete smaller changes or those I am most clear about.

5. Tackle the more complicated changes and make sure changes mesh with rest of novel.

6. See if I can talk one of my CPs (Cera Daniels... this means you!) into reviewing the changes, especially areas that need larger rewrites.

...

I'm sure there will be more steps, but that's my starting plan.

Thrilled to have gotten this far, and going to work my tail feathers off to get this book in shape!

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Breaking In (a little)

I received my first full manuscript request from an editor at Silhouette Romantic Suspense after sending the first 3 chapters (along with query letter and synopsis) at the beginning of June. The request came in the same envelope that normally delivers rejections (the one I send with my query), so I was expecting another rejection. I am thrilled to have made this progress, so while I know this doesn't mean this manuscript with be published, it does mean something in my writing caught the eye of an editor!

In other good news, one of my critique partners told me that at the RWA conference, Harlequin was looking for romantic suspense. That's great news for me!

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

I Write Like





Not sure this is ideal for a romance writer, but how fun!

Monday, May 3, 2010

MuseTrack Agent Shop

One of my dream agents is participating in MuseTrack's Agent Shop. Agent Shop is a way for writers to pitch their manuscripts electronically. The basic idea is at a predetermined time, the moderator of MuseTracks posts "GO" and everyone who wants to pitch their work emails their pitch. The first 30 (that follow the rules) pitches are posted.

The contest was set to start at 10am. At 9:50, I had both my computers on - one with the MuseTrack website up and one with my gmail account open with the pitch prepped and ready to send.

Due to some technical difficulties "GO" wasn't posted until 2pm.

You'd think during that four hours (yes, some of which I thought it had been cancelled, I had missed it, I had internet problems in which somehow only that page wasn't refreshing, and/or I had the wrong date) I would give up.

Nope. Didn't give up. For four hours (some of which, I had my husband take over the computer, so I could eat, etc.), I hit F5 on my web browser and toggled between it and my writing.

And when I saw that "GO", I emailed.

Well worth it for the chance.

And thank you to my husband who kept me utterly amused and answered my questions a hundred times without losing patience - It is May 2nd, right? Can you check the web page on your laptop and see if you see it? Wait, the word GO on the home page, right?

Seeing my post on the website this morning made it all worth it :)

Follow up: I did receive a request from one of the agents for a partial of my manuscript. Ultimately, the agent passed on the work, but did provide some advice on improving my story. The agent said, "your writing is fine," which I know isn't a glowing review, but it made me unreasonably happy.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Query Letter Sparkle

I compared my query letter with the one that Kylie helped me write. There's a couple of things I noticed about hers.

1. It's creative: it tells the plot in a unique way uses clever phrases
2. It's snappy: it reads like the back of a novel - quick and to the point, but enough to make you want to read more
3. Formatting: she put the title and character's names in CAPITAL letters - reads easy
4. It's non-academic: this is something I struggle with in my writing. After 18+ years of formalized schooling, which required endless research papers, thesis, and term papers, breaking out of the formal style was hard for me.

Going back to work on the query letter.

I hope my next project will be ready to mail out by March!